72-Year-Old Faces Jail for Tracking Pokemon TCG Driver

P​okémon TCG Delivery Tracking Incident: 72-Year-Old Ohio Man Faces Jail Time

This article reports on the case of a 72-year-old Ohio man who admitted to police that he placed a tracking device on a delivery driver's car. According to local police, the man's stated purpose was "to track her location/delivery of Pokémon cards." The event involves Pokémon TCG (Trading Card Game), collectible trading cards produced by The Pokémon Company. The category of this case is criminal surveillance and privacy violation. The case was reported by Kotaku, and the man could face up to six months in jail. The delivery driver's name, the delivery company, and the exact date of the incident are not disclosed in the source material.

Key Facts

What Did the 72-Year-Old Ohio Man Do?

The 72-year-old Ohio man admitted to placing a tracking device on the car of a delivery driver, an act confirmed by local police as the central offense in this case. His admitted motive was directly tied to the delivery of Pokémon trading cards, the collectible product line known as Pokémon TCG. The type of tracking device used and the method of installation have not been reported.

It is unknown how the delivery driver discovered the tracker or whether any additional devices were found. It is also unknown what relationship, if any, existed between the man and the driver before the incident. The source material provides no further information about the circumstances surrounding the offense.

The 72-year-old Ohio man admitted to placing a tracking device on a delivery driver's car, and he could spend up to six months in jail as a result.

Why Did He Track the Delivery Driver?

According to local police, the man's stated purpose for the tracking device was to monitor both the driver's physical location and the delivery status of Pokémon cards. His admission directly ties the surveillance to the expected arrival of Pokémon TCG merchandise. The exact quote, as reported by Kotaku and attributed to the man's statement to police, is presented below.

"to track her location/delivery of Pokémon cards"

— 72-year-old Ohio man, as reported by local police via Kotaku

The phrasing indicates the man wanted to know where the driver was traveling and when the cards would arrive. Beyond this statement, no further justification was reported. The source material does not indicate whether the cards were ever delivered, what specific Pokémon products were involved, or whether the man had attempted other methods of tracking deliveries previously.

The stated motive for the tracking device was, in the man's own words, "to track her location/delivery of Pokémon cards."

What Are the Legal Consequences?

The maximum penalty referenced for this incident is up to six months in jail, a figure confirmed in the source material. The man's location in Ohio is the only other legal data point provided. It is unknown whether formal charges have been filed, which specific statute applies, or whether fines, probation, or other penalties could accompany any jail sentence.

Because the source material does not identify the charge, conclusions about the applicable Ohio criminal code cannot be drawn. Legal outcomes in surveillance-related cases typically depend on evidence, testimony, and prior record, none of which are detailed in the report. The six-month figure is described as the upper limit of possible jail time.

The 72-year-old Ohio man could spend up to six months in jail for placing a tracking device on the Pokémon TCG delivery driver's car.

Who Should Follow This Case?

This case is directly relevant to individuals who order Pokémon TCG cards online, delivery drivers who transport collectible merchandise, and observers concerned about privacy and surveillance in package-delivery contexts. It illustrates how high-demand collectible items can, in an extreme instance, motivate a buyer to engage in invasive tracking behavior.

For e-commerce platforms and logistics providers, the incident suggests the importance of driver safety protocols. For Pokémon card collectors, it serves as a cautionary example of boundary-crossing conduct within the hobby community. The source material does not include any data on how frequently similar tracking incidents occur.

This incident demonstrates a real risk for delivery drivers of collectible trading cards: a customer may go to the extreme of installing a tracking device to observe or intercept a shipment.

Common Questions

How much jail time could the 72-year-old man face for tracking the Pokémon card delivery driver?

He could spend up to six months in jail, according to the source. The specific charge has not been disclosed, and no information about a court date, plea agreement, or sentencing hearing has been reported. Six months is the maximum penalty cited in the Kotaku report.

Why did the Ohio man put a tracking device on the delivery driver's car?

He admitted to police that his purpose was "to track her location/delivery of Pokémon cards." This statement suggests he wanted to follow the driver's movements and monitor the arrival of Pokémon TCG merchandise. No further explanation or justification was reported in the source material.

What did the man admit to local police?

He admitted to placing the tracker on the delivery driver's car. This admission is the basis of local police's report. The source does not specify whether he confessed voluntarily or only after being confronted with evidence, and no other admissions have been reported.

Sources and Methodology

This article is based entirely on a single primary source: Kotaku's report titled "72-Year-Old Faces Jail for Tracking Pokemon TCG Driver," published at kotaku.com/72-year-old-man-could-spend-up-to-six-months-in-jail-for-placing-tracking-device-on-pokemon-tcg-delivery-drivers-car-2000736531. The original report attributes its information to local police. The direct quote used in this article is reproduced verbatim from that source. No additional statistics, legal commentary, or third-party data have been added because the source material does not contain such information.

This article was last updated on May 14, 2025.